Here's the first attempt at the weekly news video. A bit of a rush job but you'll get the idea I'll do a proper one at the end of the week. It only takes an hour and I spent most of the time trying to find a suitably haunting audio accompaniment and eventually settled on Barber's Di Aggio for Strings as it's copyright free.( anyone know of a better tune?)
I'm going to do 2 a week -one will be a UK news video(can anyone think of better title than the bland one I came up with?) and a weekly 'New World Order News' video which will deal with global news.
I'm hoping that people that view the video will check out this site, which will hopefully be a gateway to the excellent sites run by my esteemed friends in the blogroll. That's the (new) plan anyway.
Looks fine to me. I'm worried that you are having to keep changing layouts because no one's taking much interest. For a fairly new blog/site you have done a fantastic job. I try and visit daily, and whilst many of the items are things I've already seen elsewhere, there is usually something that I have not. The story about "Peak Oil" is extremely worrying, and I'll bet this won't be on any of the MSM.
Your probably right but I set up the previous format to try and give some idea of how a .com site might look and try and get some help and donations to set it up but that didn't work and to be honest it looked a bit boring. I like this look it's better and I won't be changing it again.
Disclaimer - The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.
The myriad of facts, conjecture, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information in the articles, stories and commentaries posted on this site range from cutting edge hard news and comment to extreme and unusual perspectives. We choose not to sweep uncomfortable material under the rug - where it can grow and fester. We choose not to censor skewed logic and uncomfortable rhetoric. These things reflect the world as it now is - for better and worse. We present multiple facts, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information.
Journalism is (or used to be) the profession of gathering and presenting a broad panorama of news about the events of our times and presenting it to readers for their own consideration. We believe in the intelligence, judgment and wisdom of our readers to discern for themselves among the data which appears on this site that which is valid and worthy...or otherwise.
-
Although we are powerless to stop the destruction of our society, we can at
least chronicle for the information of future generations how it happened,
a bi...
Amusing Bunni: Urgent Update
-
*I can't believe I almost missed this.......*
*AMUSING BUNNI - CAROL MACKIE*
*Re-posted from Opie's blog.......*
*(5/5/13) I will be on an airplane toda...
A plea
-
A plea to both of my readers (hi, Mum). I have been quiet for a while,
which is partly due to connection problems but mostly because early in the
New Year ...
To the Fatuous Twat in the seat of POWER!
-
*HEY FATUOUS ONE! look below your game has been unveiled and you can no
longer hide behind your pretense that nothing is wrong in the world you are
intent...
3 comments:
Looks fine to me. I'm worried that you are having to keep changing layouts because no one's taking much interest. For a fairly new blog/site you have done a fantastic job. I try and visit daily, and whilst many of the items are things I've already seen elsewhere, there is usually something that I have not. The story about "Peak Oil" is extremely worrying, and I'll bet this won't be on any of the MSM.
Your probably right but I set up the previous format to try and give some idea of how a .com site might look and try and get some help and donations to set it up but that didn't work and to be honest it looked a bit boring. I like this look it's better and I won't be changing it again.
Has any one got stats on the number of managers versus front line staff?
Post a Comment